Thread: Fate of Maglor
Oooh great question and welcome to PT!!
I think it makes the most sense that he sank with Beleriand into the sea. Think about it, he was a known mariner, he is the one responsible for putting a silmaril in one of its three known resting places, water, one could officially say he had disappeared by that time, and he would probably still lament his deeds and feel the best solution is to give himself to the world, to the waves that he loved so much.
His tale is another tragic one and I don't see him going down a hero path. Rather a lost soul, more like a Nienor than a Gandalf. And knowing he would never die naturally he decided to take matters into his own hands and just let it happen. And hey, perhaps like Nienor there is a random island, or just a rock, sticking out of the ocean somewhere which is what became of the final resting place for Maglor.
Unless if my memory is wrong, didn't Beleriand sank before he had the Silmaril?
I agree, he would be more of a lost soul than a hero.
Maglor drowning in the sea shortly after he threw in the Silmaril is certainly a plausible option, however, it would make for a fairly short story. I view the influence of Melkor and the Oath as sort of poison - or addiction - influences that caused the Fenorians to behave in a non-heroic fashion, whereas their nature without those influences would have been heroic. The cure all along was to recant the Oath - but part of the disease is that one can not see or accept the cure. And, the tragic irony is that the cure is right before them and available the entire time - but pride and stubbornness blinds them. When Maglor finally casts away the Silmaril, he is recanting the Oath and it is a moment of catharsis and rebirth. Now his true nature can take over, and he could possibly live up to his original potential. I imagine Maedhros's fate as that of the lost soul - he can not keep the Silmaril and can not let it go. The only resolution is his suicide. Maglor, however, does manage to let go and recant the Oath. From this contrast of their immediate actions, its seems natural to have similar contrast in their fates.
So, this why I would not predict Maglor's future based on his actions while under the Oath, but rather by what he might have been if Melkor and the Oath had never happened. Anyway, I'm not saying either of our views is right or wrong - just that if I were to continue the story of Maglor, the rebirth scenario would seem the most sensible option to me.
Hello and welcome! I realize you are going by the 1977 Silmarillion here, but this is one of those matters where Tolkien's 'final' scenario seems a bit hazy. If interested, the external details appear to be...
... that Tolkien's 'latest known idea' (as far as I can date the relevant texts anyway) was that Maglor cast himself into the Sea. Tolkien noted this in a letter, although in The Tale of Years he seems to then retain the idea that Maglor wandered and so on -- but the latest text here is The Lay of Leithian, where Maglor (there called Maelor) casts himself into the Sea along with the Silmaril.
It's possible that Tolkien intended to represent two variant traditions about Maglor (one from a poetic source and another from a prose source), and I think this is one of those matters which actually lends itself well to variant traditions existing within the corpus. But if this is not so, again it looks like the last known path for Maglor was also self destruction (so far I haven't noticed anything later anyway).
There is also a very interesting detail in The Tale of Years concerning Maedhros: there it is he who forswears his oath and it is he who fosters Elrond and Elros with care, not Maglor.
The problem is, Tolkien doesn't get far enough in The Tale Years to even suggest who yields to whom concerning the words of Fionwe [Eonwe]; and if we go back to Qenta Noldorinwa I (1930), we see that it was Maidros who was more willing to submit to Fionwe...
... in other words, it's not a given that it was always Maglor who was more willing to submit to Eonwe, and perhaps Tolkien was thinking about switching once again, considering the revised fostering at least.
Of course anyone is free to speculate based solely upon the description chosen for the constructed Silmarillion (and obviously it was Tolkien's own idea, at least at one point), but again for possible sake of interest, this is part of the textual scenario as it existed, as revealed by Christopher Tolkien in later publications.
Called it!! Sort of....
Truly a sad and mornful example of fate.
So, does anyone else see Maglor casting the last Silmaril into the sea as a recanting of the Oath? As a catharsis and rebirth? Or am I alone in that interpretation?
Not really recanted. The Oath was simply deemed void.
"The oath says not that we may not bide our time, and it may be that in Valinor all shall be forgiven and forgot, and we shall come into our own in peace.
But Maedhros answered that if they returned to Aman but the favour of the Valar were withheld from them, then their oath would still remain, but its fulfilment be beyond all hope; and he said: 'Who can tell to what dreadful doom we shall come, if we disobey the Powers in their own land, or purpose ever to bring war again into their holy realm?'
Yet Maglor still held back, saying: 'If Manwë and Varda themselves deny the fulfilment of an oath to which we named them in witness, is it not made void?